Friday, January 20, 2017

Generations


Our video starts out with difference between me, my parents, and my grandparents, and their differences. There are some differences—but also some similarities. Many of these similarities are called traditions. Grandparents usually train their children to be honest, have good moral character, be well educated, and overall good citizens. My parents wanted the same for me, just as your parents wanted that for you. If you are a parent, you probably want to pass those and other characteristics on to your children. How do you pass those good traits on to our children? Brothers and sisters born a year to eighteen months apart can be so different.

Methods tried on one child, may not work on your other child. There are many variables to consider before making generalized or stereo-typed conclusions. Peer pressure is a very real variable, friends may use a jargon very different from what another family may be used to hearing, and families need to be careful not to be hypocritical or judgmental about diversity. When it comes to slackers there are some in every generations. It also depends on what your definition slacker. I don’t teach school, but I deal with children and young people in my church and they have a lot to deal with.

 Teaching a Sunday school class a few years ago, there was a wide range of students in grades 2nd through 5th, at times it was difficult to hold the attention of some of the 2nd graders, and on the hand, keep from boring the 5th graders. Once we found a project that kept the attention of the 2nd graders and didn’t bore our 5th graders it made the job much easier. Age differences and the maturity of the students play a vital part in teaching. Getting to know the students and listing to them as they entered the classroom as to some of their hobbies, and not looking at generational differences to really any great extent helped us choose a different strategy.  I would rather make decisions based on the content of their character and that takes getting to know them.

Solomon once said, “There is nothing new under the sun.” If what one of the articles states is true that more recent homeland generation is starting to returning to extremely protective parenting, traditions, academic achievement, and a renewed focus on social development. It looks like the generations have took a full turn and coming back to those basics of what a lot of many parents. They are smarter I have had students who could not or would remember to bring their Bibles to class, but with the smart-phone the Bible could be downloaded and they can’t leave home without it.

Another tool we want for our children and students is for them to become independent learners and thinkers. We don’t want them to brain washed by falsehoods. As teacher’s we should not be fooled either. Don’t look at little Johnny and say, “that sound like little Johnny.” We don’t know what other variables are happening to little Johnny.

A friend of mine is a teacher, one of the objectives she has for her students is to become independent learners, where they will investigate thoroughly articles like the “Prensky” so they become categorized or stereo-typed, nor deceived. But think more in terms of what Professor Thomas C. Reeve’s article, Do Generational Differences Matter in Instructional Design? Values, habits, and motivators are important and birth year is only one factor for laboring generations and that research shows that history does more to shape individuals.  


5 comments:

  1. So, the question becomes: how much can we rely on these generalizations to make effective and efficient instructional decisions? That is, we all know teachers are pressed for time, and often fall prey to using things they've 'heard about' through colleagues and sound bites, without paying attention to research. Of course, getting to know students is a key component of instructional design decisions, but if you're a high school teacher with 150+ students, relying on generational characteristics is almost a necessity.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm not saying that some of the research isn't helpful, but a lot of research can be done in the classroom and I think that is where blended learning comes into play along with changing interesting bits the curriculum, adding fun, and a lot of teacher creativity. I would like to see teachers and parents work together to change some of these myths, but parents have to be educated on generational difference also. The best research is in the classroom using what works and getting rid of what doesn't. I don't teach maybe I'm an idealist. By the way do high school teacher have a 150 student, sound like college?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sandra, 150 total is pretty close. About 30 students a class, 5 classes a day (one hour for prep.)
      The school I'm doing research in right now has a 31 student maximum, so of course all 3 of the Bio1 classes I'm working with have 31 students each.

      I do actually agree that relying on generational characteristics aids high school teachers, but I wouldn't say that relying on generational research is. I really didn't see anything in the research that I thought was both important enough to guide instruction and subtle enough that teachers wouldn't easily come to the realization of these characteristics on their own. I'd be especially hesitant to depend on the research considering how shoddily most of the research seems to be done, according to the Reeves article.
      I was fairly impressed by Twenge's research, as it appears both Reeves and Quenqua were. It does seem like she's used a much more rigorous methodology, though I do understand the point made by critics that the instruments she analyzes may test self confidence more than egocentrism and narcissism. The one thing I'd really like to aid Twenge's research is to give the same surveys to contemporary adults, and see whether their answers trend more towards narcissistic traits than expected. This would help rule out the possibility that we're just seeing a societal shift in the acceptability of "prideful" talk about oneself.

      Delete
  3. Hi Sandra, my blog simulates yours relating to traditional ways of learning within cross generations.
    Like you, I am not an teacher but, I work with children and adults learners as a profession. I am also in the generation of the Baby Boomers. I support and agree with your thoughts of learning similarities labeled as traditions. I can relate to this traditional similarity by the way I was personally raised by my Grandmother and parents, as well as my involvement with teaching adults learners and children. These traditions of learning come from the "basics" as you mentioned of how we have been taught, which I believe has a true relationship to your personal learning environment. How you adapt within that environment is a key fact to productive learning outcomes. Adapting to learning involves all generations and "Blended" effort to reach learning outcomes.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sandra, while classroom teachers should act as their own researchers, they need to be ULTRASENSITIVE to confirmation bias, which (in combination to a lack of time and access to quality research) is the probably the primary reason why educators often fall prey to myths and fads like learning styles and multiple intelligence theory driving curriculum.

    ReplyDelete